Edge Labs EDGE LABS Market intelligence
CFB NFL
Edge Labs · CFB · Talent vs Record

The talent a roster signed vs what it did.

Every FBS team's recruiting talent (the 4-year composite, and its national rank that season) lined up against its actual record. The gap is the story · who outran the roster they had, and who left blue-chip talent on the field. National rank, record, and the sample behind each, on every team.

Read this first

Talent is a leading indicator and records drift back toward the roster. In our point-in-time test (2020·2025, n>150 each side), teams that outran their recruiting talent fell about 15 win-percentage points the next season, and the ones that underachieved rose about as much. So these gaps tend to close next year. That is a direction the data leans, not a guaranteed pick and not a bet.

+98gap · pts Biggest overachiever · 2026
New Mexico
Mountain West · talent #134 of 137 · 2-0 (2 g)
thin talent (#134 of 137), went 2-0. Outran the roster.
-72gap · pts Biggest underachiever · 2026
Georgia Tech
ACC · talent #39 of 137 · 0-2 (2 g)
mid-pack talent (#39 of 137), went 0-2. Left it on the field.

Filters

season · league
Overachiever · won more than the talent rank implied. Underrated roster.
Underachiever · blue-chip talent, thin record. Wasted talent.
Gap = win% minus where the talent rank sits in the field, in percentage points.
All FBS · 2026 Talent vs record · biggest gaps first
n=129 teams · 129 ranked
Team Talent rank Composite Record Win% Gap (pts)
New MexicoMountain West #134 / 137 58.4 2-0 (2g) 100% +98
TulsaAAC #103 / 137 65.6 2-0 (2g) 100% +75
James MadisonSun Belt #99 / 137 65.8 2-0 (2g) 100% +72
Georgia TechACC #39 / 137 72.8 0-2 (2g) 0% -72
RutgersBig Ten #43 / 137 72.4 0-2 (2g) 0% -69
Georgia StateSun Belt #91 / 137 66.6 2-0 (2g) 100% +66
UTSAAAC #85 / 137 67.9 2-0 (2g) 100% +62
TroySun Belt #81 / 137 68.2 2-0 (2g) 100% +59
Colorado StatePac-12 #80 / 137 68.4 2-0 (2g) 100% +58
VirginiaACC #79 / 137 68.4 2-0 (2g) 100% +57
East CarolinaAAC #66 / 137 69.9 0-2 (2g) 0% -52
DelawareC-USA #137 / 137 57.0 1-1 (2g) 50% +50
Ohio StateBig Ten #1 / 137 85.4 1-1 (2g) 50% -50
Kennesaw StateC-USA #136 / 137 57.1 1-1 (2g) 50% +49
West VirginiaBig 12 #68 / 137 69.6 2-0 (2g) 100% +49
CharlotteAAC #71 / 137 69.4 0-2 (2g) 0% -49
CincinnatiBig 12 #67 / 137 69.9 2-0 (2g) 100% +49
Fresno StatePac-12 #135 / 137 58.1 1-1 (2g) 50% +49
Old DominionSun Belt #133 / 137 60.4 1-1 (2g) 50% +47
BYUBig 12 #65 / 137 70.2 2-0 (2g) 100% +47
DukeACC #64 / 137 70.2 2-0 (2g) 100% +46
Wake ForestACC #63 / 137 70.3 2-0 (2g) 100% +46
South FloridaAAC #62 / 137 70.6 2-0 (2g) 100% +45
Kent StateMAC #129 / 137 62.4 1-1 (2g) 50% +44
Central MichiganMAC #128 / 137 62.5 1-1 (2g) 50% +43
Oregon StatePac-12 #78 / 137 68.4 0-2 (2g) 0% -43
OregonBig Ten #11 / 137 80.4 1-1 (2g) 50% -43
OklahomaSEC #12 / 137 79.8 1-1 (2g) 50% -42
NorthwesternBig Ten #58 / 137 70.9 1-0 (1g) 100% +42
UTEPMountain West #126 / 137 62.6 1-1 (2g) 50% +42
Missouri StateC-USA #124 / 137 63.0 1-1 (2g) 50% +40
Florida StateACC #14 / 137 79.4 1-1 (2g) 50% -40
ClemsonACC #15 / 137 79.1 1-1 (2g) 50% -40
Air ForceMountain West #123 / 137 63.0 1-1 (2g) 50% +40
UtahBig 12 #54 / 137 71.5 2-0 (2g) 100% +39
ArmyAAC #121 / 137 63.6 1-1 (2g) 50% +38
NevadaMountain West #119 / 137 63.7 1-1 (2g) 50% +37
Michigan StateBig Ten #50 / 137 71.8 2-0 (2g) 100% +36
Western MichiganMAC #118 / 137 63.9 1-1 (2g) 50% +36
Western KentuckyC-USA #89 / 137 67.0 0-2 (2g) 0% -35
TCUBig 12 #21 / 137 75.5 1-1 (2g) 50% -35
Coastal CarolinaSun Belt #117 / 137 64.3 1-1 (2g) 50% +35
UCLABig Ten #47 / 137 72.0 2-0 (2g) 100% +34
WisconsinBig Ten #23 / 137 75.0 1-1 (2g) 50% -34
TempleAAC #115 / 137 64.6 1-1 (2g) 50% +34
San Diego StatePac-12 #114 / 137 64.8 1-1 (2g) 50% +33
IowaBig Ten #45 / 137 72.3 2-0 (2g) 100% +32
BaylorBig 12 #25 / 137 74.4 1-1 (2g) 50% -32
Washington StatePac-12 #93 / 137 66.2 0-2 (2g) 0% -32
Louisiana TechC-USA #113 / 137 64.8 1-1 (2g) 50% +32
PittsburghACC #42 / 137 72.4 2-0 (2g) 100% +30
Texas TechBig 12 #41 / 137 72.7 2-0 (2g) 100% +29
New Mexico StateC-USA #131 / 137 60.7 1-2 (3g) 33% +29
UCFBig 12 #30 / 137 73.9 1-1 (2g) 50% -29
NavyAAC #108 / 137 65.0 1-1 (2g) 50% +29
Kansas StateBig 12 #40 / 137 72.7 2-0 (2g) 100% +29
Ball StateMAC #107 / 137 65.0 1-1 (2g) 50% +28
HoustonBig 12 #38 / 137 73.0 2-0 (2g) 100% +27
Florida InternationalC-USA #106 / 137 65.2 1-1 (2g) 50% +27
KentuckySEC #33 / 137 73.7 1-1 (2g) 50% -26
SMUACC #37 / 137 73.2 2-0 (2g) 100% +26
MarshallSun Belt #105 / 137 65.3 1-1 (2g) 50% +26
WyomingMountain West #104 / 137 65.5 1-1 (2g) 50% +26
IndianaBig Ten #36 / 137 73.3 2-0 (2g) 100% +26
StanfordACC #35 / 137 73.4 1-1 (2g) 50% -25
BuffaloMAC #102 / 137 65.7 1-1 (2g) 50% +24
WashingtonBig Ten #34 / 137 73.7 2-0 (2g) 100% +24
Georgia SouthernSun Belt #101 / 137 65.8 1-1 (2g) 50% +24
Arkansas StateSun Belt #100 / 137 65.8 1-1 (2g) 50% +23
NebraskaBig Ten #32 / 137 73.8 2-0 (2g) 100% +23
ColoradoBig 12 #31 / 137 73.8 2-0 (2g) 100% +22
AkronMAC #98 / 137 65.9 1-1 (2g) 50% +21
Texas StateSun Belt #109 / 137 64.9 0-2 (2g) 0% -21
Mississippi StateSEC #29 / 137 74.0 2-0 (2g) 100% +21
Boise StatePac-12 #96 / 137 66.1 1-1 (2g) 50% +20
TennesseeSEC #28 / 137 74.2 2-0 (2g) 100% +20
Utah StatePac-12 #111 / 137 64.8 0-2 (2g) 0% -19
North CarolinaACC #27 / 137 74.2 2-0 (2g) 100% +19
Boston CollegeACC #44 / 137 72.3 1-1 (2g) 50% -18
VanderbiltSEC #26 / 137 74.2 2-0 (2g) 100% +18
North TexasAAC #94 / 137 66.2 1-1 (2g) 50% +18
MemphisAAC #70 / 137 69.5 2-1 (3g) 67% +17
LouisvilleACC #46 / 137 72.2 1-1 (2g) 50% -17
Virginia TechACC #24 / 137 74.9 2-0 (2g) 100% +17
IllinoisBig Ten #92 / 137 66.6 1-1 (2g) 50% +17
MarylandBig Ten #22 / 137 75.1 2-0 (2g) 100% +15
ArizonaBig 12 #48 / 137 71.9 1-1 (2g) 50% -15
RiceAAC #90 / 137 66.9 1-1 (2g) 50% +15
Sam HoustonC-USA #116 / 137 64.3 0-2 (2g) 0% -15
UNLVMountain West #112 / 137 64.8 1-2 (3g) 33% +15
Oklahoma StateBig 12 #49 / 137 71.8 1-1 (2g) 50% -15
Middle TennesseeC-USA #88 / 137 67.5 1-1 (2g) 50% +14
MissouriSEC #20 / 137 75.8 2-0 (2g) 100% +14
Eastern MichiganMAC #110 / 137 64.9 1-2 (3g) 33% +13
KansasBig 12 #51 / 137 71.6 1-1 (2g) 50% -13
USCBig Ten #19 / 137 76.5 3-0 (3g) 100% +13
LibertyC-USA #87 / 137 67.7 1-1 (2g) 50% +13
South AlabamaSun Belt #86 / 137 67.8 1-1 (2g) 50% +13
MinnesotaBig Ten #52 / 137 71.5 1-1 (2g) 50% -12
Ole MissSEC #18 / 137 78.2 2-0 (2g) 100% +13
AuburnSEC #17 / 137 78.6 2-0 (2g) 100% +12
Iowa StateBig 12 #53 / 137 71.5 1-1 (2g) 50% -12
Bowling GreenMAC #122 / 137 63.1 0-2 (2g) 0% -11
MichiganBig Ten #16 / 137 78.7 2-0 (2g) 100% +11
SyracuseACC #55 / 137 71.5 1-1 (2g) 50% -10
OhioMAC #83 / 137 68.1 1-1 (2g) 50% +10
UConnIndependent #82 / 137 68.2 1-1 (2g) 50% +10
ArkansasSEC #56 / 137 71.3 1-1 (2g) 50% -10
Arizona StateBig 12 #57 / 137 71.0 1-1 (2g) 50% -9
Penn StateBig Ten #13 / 137 79.6 2-0 (2g) 100% +9
Northern IllinoisMountain West #125 / 137 62.7 0-2 (2g) 0% -9
TulaneAAC #59 / 137 70.8 1-1 (2g) 50% -7
NC StateACC #60 / 137 70.8 1-1 (2g) 50% -7
South CarolinaSEC #10 / 137 80.5 2-0 (2g) 100% +7
UABAAC #77 / 137 68.5 1-1 (2g) 50% +6
LSUSEC #9 / 137 80.6 2-0 (2g) 100% +6
Jacksonville StateC-USA #84 / 137 68.0 1-2 (3g) 33% -6
Florida AtlanticAAC #76 / 137 68.6 1-1 (2g) 50% +5
FloridaSEC #8 / 137 80.6 2-0 (2g) 100% +5
Notre DameIndependent #7 / 137 81.1 2-0 (2g) 100% +4
Southern MissSun Belt #75 / 137 68.8 1-1 (2g) 50% +4
MiamiACC #6 / 137 82.2 2-0 (2g) 100% +4
Miami (OH)MAC #74 / 137 69.1 1-1 (2g) 50% +4
PurdueBig Ten #73 / 137 69.3 1-1 (2g) 50% +3
GeorgiaSEC #5 / 137 82.7 2-0 (2g) 100% +3
Texas A&MSEC #4 / 137 83.6 2-0 (2g) 100% +2
TexasSEC #3 / 137 84.1 2-0 (2g) 100% +1
AlabamaSEC #2 / 137 84.1 2-0 (2g) 100% +1
ToledoMAC #69 / 137 69.5 1-1 (2g) 50% 0
National talent rank is across all 129 FBS programs with a composite this season · record is regular season from game results · gap = win% minus the talent-rank percentile, in points · a frequency and a direction, never a pick or a bet.

This is talent intelligence, not a betting edge. The recruiting composite does not beat the spread · we tested it and it lands near a coin flip against the number in every bucket. What it does do is show where a roster's talent and its record pulled apart, and that gap tends to regress. Every number ships with its sample (games behind the record, programs behind the rank). Research, not advice.